Wednesday, October 04, 2006

If The Page Is Underage Then Put The Perps In A Cage

As soon as the Foley story broke, I made my position perfectly clear from the git go, those that knew gots to be through. From Hastert (depending on what he knew and when) to the individual or news agency that held the story (for how long???) before it was leaked all the way down the line to AOL for being a crappy isp and losing me money in their crappy stock. I have tried to avoid being partisan, for I see this as a criminal issue, and crime and corruption is neither red nor blue. But as I troll the liberal blogs and tune in to MSNBC I cant help but see a double standard. They truly are frickin morons whose politics are driven strictly by hate.

The Republican Party has proven that they do not deserve to keep Congress, but the Democrats have proven they deserve it less, but if they somehow manage it, the ensuing two years of jackassery will, unless major changes take place in the dem party result in the permanent demise of the modern day democratic party. You heard it here first. And now for a different take you wont see on the MSM...

"We have a lot more questions about this whole affair. The timing of the revelations, as we noted, couldn't be more propitious for the Democrats. Turns out both the Democrats and several newspapers seem to have known about Foley's problem as far back as November, according to research by several enterprising blogs.
Why didn't they come forward then? Who dredged up these e-mails -- and why did they hold them until now? This reeks of political trickery.
We're glad Foley's gone. He betrayed Congress, his party and the trust of the 33 pages who serve in Congress, and their parents. He behaved immorally, and we won't be surprised at new revelations.
That said, if this scandal is the Democrats' answer to their problems at the polls, it's pretty pathetic. It shows a base contempt for the voters."

Ibd

Like I said before "
all that knew must be through" (sorry Im reading Johnny Cochrans book, Im a rhyming fool lately)

ALL... Dems....GOPs....ALL

EE-Aw!!!

...speaking of rhyming, keeping with new Auroran tradition of bringing you the best in parlour gaming...ya gots to check out "
The Irish Rhyming Game". You dont have to be drunk, I mean Irish to play it, you just have to be drunk to enjoy it.

4 comments:

Miss Carnivorous said...

I've told you and told you that's how gay men act! Age is no object. they just get it on with each other every which way. They get down with all shapes sizes and races baby. The don't have to worry about teen pregnancy either!

anita said...

miss c., i think you are wrong to attribute this quality of extreme and uncircumspect horniness to gay men in particular. i think it's a quality of many men in throughout the overall population.

just as gays are a certain percentage of the population, so are sexual abusers ... and sexual abusers range the entire spectrum from gay, bisexual to straight.

from what i hear, all these 'statistics' spewing from the christian right about sexual predators being overwhelming gay is, as i understand it, not borne out in the statistics.

Rhino-itall said...

anita, why do you say the "christian right"?

You're so obviously hostile towards the christian religion. I haven't EVER seen you mention the "anti-christian left" or the "anti religion left"

I don't know what stats you're talking about, and i'm no expert on gays, but it wouldn't surprise me to find out that gay men are more likely to be child abusers since they have a CLUB CALLED THE NORTH AMERICAN MAN BOY LOVE ASSOCIATION. the key words being MAN and BOY!
Add to that the fact that they're men, and since most 15-16 year old boys are always horned up it would make sense that the gay ones would be willing to hook up with men.

anita said...

rhino, when i say 'christian right' i am referring to a particular group of people who have a lot of power within a certain political party. their power stems not from their religious convictions, but from their sheer number and the dollars and cents they can bring to the candidates they favor.

i am not hostile toward religion per se. i am hostile toward organized religion that very often has a tendency to become corrupt, extreme and lacking in the actual values they claim to espouse.