Recently a post about Jim Thorpe resulted in a debate about intelligent design versus darwinism. Dont ask I have no idea either. Patrick J Buchanan addressed this same issue today, and rather eloquently made some outstanding points (its what the guy does...hes wicked smart). Ill let PJB take it from here.
Darwinism claims, for example, that matter evolved from non-matter – i.e., something from nothing – that life evolved from non-life; that, through natural selection, rudimentary forms evolved into more complex forms; and that men are descended from animals or apes.
Now, all of this is unproven theory. And as the Darwinists have never been able to create matter out of non-matter or life out of non-life, or extract from the fossil record the "missing links" between species, what they are asking is that we accept it all on faith. And the response they are getting in the classroom and public forum is: "Prove it," and, "Where is your evidence?"
read whole article
13 comments:
What EXACTLY did he say that went too far? You are a sheep buying into the hate mongering left's hype.
he's a zealot!!
If you are implying that his honesty goes too far than maybe you are correct. We dont elect honest politicians we elect sound bites and talking points
Once again I kindly ask you for examples, not clever catch phrases.
And big spending big gov't imperialistic neocons are the true Republicans? If so then be prepared for an eventual split in the party.
and?
Buchanan is a quasi-isolationist and did not support the current Iraq war from the start, so it is of no suprise he had an anti-war PS.
I am still kindly waitng for an actual example of his "argumentitive stance" or his "going too far". Your guilt by association comment in regards to Justin Raimondo aint cutting it.
and stop quoting some canuck chick or ill ban you....to canada
Hearsay
However....
ipso facto, by pardoning Jonathon Pollard AND Marc Rich two well known and one convicted agent for the Mossad, one could argue that the Clintons were in fact co-provocateurs for Israel. So much so that Hillary made it a part of her campaign platform in Jewish neighborhoods in her run for NY Senate.
And colorful language aside, would you not agree that US foreign policy is GREATLY shaped by Israel? (not that thats wrong, Israel is a good ally)
Wife, what is your source for that p buc piece? i doubt that you read the whole actual memo, maybe it was taken out of context. Also, even if it is correctly used it is from 1971! back then we didn't think black men were smart enough to play qb in the nfl! i know i use that example before, but i don't think you can use something from 35 years ago to judge a man today.
Twenty years ago when people didn't let black men into the QB ranks, everyone was racist...Rhino you knew people back then...so doesn't that make you a racist? Just kidding, I missed out on the fun here...Happy two-dizzerizzle-a-nickle-n-one-bit-ches!
actually fly, i didn't know anyone back then
Post a Comment