So this clown James Hansen who has been pushing the AGW bullshit for all these years was being paid MILLIONS of dollars to do so.
I'm SHOCKED.... that a SCIENTIST could do something so outrageous! I'm flabbergasted at such a thought. Scientists are pure and honest.... Especially the ones that work for the government and NASA!
Now that the climate gate stuff has shown the whole world that AGW is a lie even the media is starting to actually do their job and ask questions and do some fact finding.
Read it and weep SUCKERS
17 comments:
I know you never read my links but I usually read yours. But I think i will make an exception for Fox News. If it's on Fox it's probably not true.
Yes of course. And if it was from the NY Times you would read it but then attack the writer as someone who is not a climate scientist. and if he was a climate scientist you would say he has never been published in a peer reviewed paper and if he was published you would say he was paid by "big oil".
That way you never have to actually argue with facts.
This is why I believe you're stupid. Not because you got a low score on your SAT but because you willfully live in ignorance.
You revel in ignorance. A few days ago you trotted out some non-climatologist, who knows nothing about climate or global warming. I know why you find him credible: he's a rightwinger and he agrees with you. Why should I take him seriously? And yes, I take the opinion of the National Academy of Sciences and 97% of the world's climatolgists more seriously than a small number of non-climatologists and Exxon-paid hacks. This makes me stupid in your eyes but stupid is as stupid does.
I rest my case.
What part of alarmists lie dont you understand.
Its not opinion, its not Fox spin, and its not ExxonMobil propoganda.
They lie, repeatedly, they get caught, repeatedly.
You chose to ignore this simple truth because facts arent important to you.
Common sense dictates that if the evidence was as overwhelming as you would have us believe, your side wouldnt have to lie about the data at every turn.
But all your "facts" aren't true. ClimateGate was bullshit. Your last "expert" wasnt' even a climatologist. Give me ONE reason why I should take him seriously (or you).
gary please just stop commenting. You're not rational.
We've been over this a too many times to rehash it. No matter what we or anyone else says you will NEVER change your mind. You are a believer and nobody can shake your faith. I believe in freedom of religion so you go worship your god algore and move along now.
You have NEVER even attempted to explain why a rational person should believe that the 97% are wrong and the 3% right, even though they never seem to do any actual research on global warming, and many of them are on Exxon's payroll. Hell, a few days ago you linked to a non-climatologist and you refuse to give any reason why you think he is credible (because you can't).
But ClimateGate proves that it's all a big lie, a plot of some kind, no matter that five investigations (only of of which was by East Anglia) proved what was obvious from the beginning, that ClimateGate was small potatoes.
No my friend, you are the true believer here, against all the evidence and impervious to reason.
I just happen to be smart enough not to believe liars.
You are not.
So you can't answer me. OK.
what are you talking about? The sea level lie? They admitted that they do it and claimed it's an adjustment for percieved volume of water?? do you even know how to read?
gary just do yourself a favor and stop arguing. go back to the daily kos or whatever echo chamber you live in so your beliefs won't be questioned.
"You have NEVER even attempted to explain why a rational person should believe that the 97% are wrong and the 3% right, even though they never seem to do any actual research on global warming, and many of them are on Exxon's payroll."
That's what you can't answer. That and why should I find the non-climatologist guy credible.
gary believe what and who you want. we don't care.
97% isn't true. 3% isn't true. climategate is real. only the "internal" investigation cleared them of wrong doing.
you are a sheep and unfortunately you are in the majority in this world. People like algore count on the fact that most people are suckers that he can hustle.
and just to reiterate about the population bomb conversation we had, now it's algore who's pushing the population control angle! you never responded to that one because you knew you looked like an idiot and i don't blame you.
just keep following the masses...baaaaa .... baaaaa....
Matt Damon
Uh, there were at least five investigations, one of which was internal. A number of studies have shown the consensus at 90-97%.
The population has doubled in my lifetime and may double again (depending on how long I live). Some of the worst-case scenarious (famine, etc) have not come true but it would be simply silly to believe that the population bomb will have no effect.
I am not a climatologist, not even a scientist. If I were a policy maker, let's say the President I would be guided by the informed opinion of the National Academy of Sciences over some non-climatologist or some Exxon-paid hack.
I wonder if Gary is aware that the 97% number he's been throwing around is from a study of onlu 75 climatologists.
Its reminds me of the famous true believer quote.
"I dont know how Richard Nixon could have won, I dont know anybody who voted for him"
Bah!
4 out of 5 dentists prefer trident. I only asked 5 dentists and I watched them buy the gum before I asked but still that's a good percentage.
How many people who worked on the IPCC report were actual scientists by the way? How many were politicians or paid government employees? How many were lobbyists? I'm pretty sure we did a post on that a few years ago.
More importantly I can think for myself. The U.N. is a completely crooked organization on every level. Why would anyone believe a report that they put out that would conveniently take money from the wealthy developed countries and give it to the poor backwards countries in the name of global warming. and if it's global warming then why isn't the earth warming and if it's global warming then why did they change it to "climate change" etc. etc. etc.
Too many lies.
But suckers will still believe because they're stupid or too lazy to think for themselves or both.
baaaa... baaaa....
I'm out.
Post a Comment