I already said that one could make a case that Obama wasn't qualified. No one can make a case that Palin is. I suppose his two years in the Senate are a match for her two years as Governor. Clearly he is more intelligent than she is.
I could easily make the case that Obama wasn't qualified and did. I could also easily make the case that Palin is qualified. I also don't believe he is more intelligent.
However all of that doesn't answer the question. You have asserted that Palin is not qualified and that you can no longer take me seriously. So please enlighten us here at the aurora and tell me what those qualifications would be.
One qualification would be intelligence. Sarah Palin is lacking. If you can't see that then either you're an idiot, or your views are so warped by ideology that you are functionally an idiot where politics are concerned.
Is she cant name a newspaper she reads off the top of her head dumb or thinks there are 57 states dumb or gets caugh stealing Neil Kinnocks lifestory dumb???
See, intelligence is relative. In the Bush Kerry election, it was perceived that Kerry was smart and Bush was dumb, yet Bush scored better grades throughout his education. Take away Kerry's french classes and it was by alot.
So whats the barameter?
Liberals go to the dumb thing, because its a crutch for them, they are unable to debate conservative principles so they call them names.
Obama is an empty suited voice unable to put two sentences together without a teleprompter, and yet the left consider him THE SMARTEST PRESIDENT EVER (that wont release his grades)
So then Palin is qualified. Not only does she have previous political experience (in the executive branch) she has run her own business in the private sector as well. Certainly has strong positions on the issues of the day, and goes without saying she is of strong moral character.
In short, she meets all your criteria, but since you either too lazy or inept intellectually to debate her positions, you just says shes dumb and unqualified.
Bottom line is that you dont like her and you disagree with her, and I could respect that if you were man enough to just admit it and debate her on the merits of her ideas.
But you are a coward, so you just call her dumb and unqualified without citing one single policiy disagreement.
She flubbed a Courinc question and Tina Fey mocked her, and in your infantile mind thats good enough for you.
15 comments:
So is gary.....I think...
How about we both agree that Sarah Palin is smarter than yogurt? Although yogurt would probably make a better President.
So you can't answer the question gary? What qualifies someone to be President?
I already said that one could make a case that Obama wasn't qualified. No one can make a case that Palin is. I suppose his two years in the Senate are a match for her two years as Governor. Clearly he is more intelligent than she is.
I could easily make the case that Obama wasn't qualified and did. I could also easily make the case that Palin is qualified. I also don't believe he is more intelligent.
However all of that doesn't answer the question. You have asserted that Palin is not qualified and that you can no longer take me seriously. So please enlighten us here at the aurora and tell me what those qualifications would be.
One qualification would be intelligence. Sarah Palin is lacking. If you can't see that then either you're an idiot, or your views are so warped by ideology that you are functionally an idiot where politics are concerned.
Is she cant name a newspaper she reads off the top of her head dumb or thinks there are 57 states dumb or gets caugh stealing Neil Kinnocks lifestory dumb???
See, intelligence is relative. In the Bush Kerry election, it was perceived that Kerry was smart and Bush was dumb, yet Bush scored better grades throughout his education. Take away Kerry's french classes and it was by alot.
So whats the barameter?
Liberals go to the dumb thing, because its a crutch for them, they are unable to debate conservative principles so they call them names.
Obama is an empty suited voice unable to put two sentences together without a teleprompter, and yet the left consider him THE SMARTEST PRESIDENT EVER (that wont release his grades)
Libs sure are dumb.
The big knock on Reagan from the left was that he was stupid..and he ended up being the best president of the last 100 plus years.
Interesting
So gary you believe she's not intelligent.
What other qualification would you require. Clearly not every intelligent person in the country would be qualified.
Tell me what else?
Previous experience in politics or business. Good judgement. Positions on the major issues of the day. Moral character.
So then Palin is qualified. Not only does she have previous political experience (in the executive branch) she has run her own business in the private sector as well. Certainly has strong positions on the issues of the day, and goes without saying she is of strong moral character.
In short, she meets all your criteria, but since you either too lazy or inept intellectually to debate her positions, you just says shes dumb and unqualified.
You sir are a mental midget.
The other qualifications really don't matter if she's not smart enough. And she's not. This is transparently obvious to all nonidiots.
Bottom line is that you dont like her and you disagree with her, and I could respect that if you were man enough to just admit it and debate her on the merits of her ideas.
But you are a coward, so you just call her dumb and unqualified without citing one single policiy disagreement.
She flubbed a Courinc question and Tina Fey mocked her, and in your infantile mind thats good enough for you.
There are intelligent Conservatives. I don't agree with them but I recognize their intelligence. Sarah Palin is not one of them.
Wow, interesting point. Your argument in defense of calling Sarah Palin dumb is to call her dumb. Way to make your case.
You are not a serious person.
Go troll elsewhere.
Post a Comment