When Is Something You Already Know News?

Just because the media didn't report it, doesn't mean wmd's weren't found. The Aurora clearly demonstrated Saddams violation of numerous UN Resolutions regarding weapons of mass destruction years ago. In other words, once again we were right, liberals were wrong.

"An initial glance at the WikiLeaks war logs doesn’t reveal evidence of some massive WMD program by the Saddam Hussein regime — the Bush administration’s most (in)famous rationale for invading Iraq. But chemical weapons, especially, did not vanish from the Iraqi battlefield. Remnants of Saddam’s toxic arsenal, largely destroyed after the Gulf War, remained. Jihadists, insurgents and foreign (possibly Iranian) agitators turned to these stockpiles during the Iraq conflict — and may have brewed up their own deadly agents.
In August 2004, for instance, American forces surreptitiously purchased what they believed to be containers of liquid sulfur mustard, a toxic “blister agent” used as a chemical weapon since World War I. The troops tested the liquid, and “reported two positive results for blister.” The chemical was then “triple-sealed and transported to a secure site” outside their base. …
Nearly three years later, American troops were still finding WMD in the region. An armored Buffalo vehicle unearthed a cache of artillery shells “that was covered by sacks and leaves under an Iraqi Community Watch checkpoint. “The 155mm rounds are filled with an unknown liquid, and several of which are leaking a black tar-like substance.” Initial tests were inconclusive. But later, “the rounds tested positive for mustard.” link

Obviously, upon further review of the evidence we once again applaud former President Bush, The United States Congress, and the United Nations for realizing the need to remove Saddam and dismantle the threat of his weapons programs as well as punish him for the clear violations of UN Resolutions. We would also like to thank President Obama for having the courage to go against his very own campaign rhetoric as the "anti-war" candidate, and that of his liberal brethren to continue the successful policies of Pres. George W. Bush in Iraq, despite wrongly criticising him every step of the way. Its not easy to admit you were wrong, and even harder to do the right thing.