Memo
To: Michael Vick
From: Donkeyhue
Subject: The Dilly
Ok heres the dilly. Next time try beheading a western journalist. If you have a pilots license then immediately proceeed into the next building. Fire a weapon on an American soldier if your finger itches. Feel free to talk on tape about blowing up the Brooklyn Bridge or the Sears Tower... screw you JC Penny.
Lawyers will be clamoring as loud as the civil libertarians to applaud and defend you.
But and this is a big but....
Just dont hurt dogs.
... or put a koran in the shitter
... and another thing dont be black
26 comments:
Yes, surprisingly, even liberals have limits. Of course they would never resort to violence against their beloved "Black people" whose asses they (almost) never tire of licking, unlike the violence they are only too willing to perpetrate against "evil" scientists involved in animal research, which while sad and unpleasant, is actually a useful pursuit.
Blacks can rape, torture and kill each other and when the "pigs" try to stop them the liberals scream "Police brutality!" "Profiling!" "Discrimin-ation!" Of course the liberals fucked up the Blacks so they should feel guilty, but instead of compounding the pathologies of Black people the liberals should correct their previous mistakes.
Liberals are a sorry lot and I do despise them. I am for beheading the Dems and dropping their little empty heads on the insurgent areas of Iraq. That will show the insurgents what we think of the traitorous turncoats and how little heed we pay them! Or, we can replace the animals in animal research with lefties, thus saving animals from torture.
Do I sound harsh?
You know, I like Conservatives. Really. It's just that there are so few of them. Most so-called conservatives are actually neoconservatives or proto-fascists or just racists.
One of the few actual conservatives is Ron Paul. I don't agree with him on everything, but I respect him as a principled libertarian conservative.
Thats just stupid, but typical of your style of debate. Since you cant win an argument against a conservative viewpoint you resort to name calling. Its always about the labels with you commies. Neocon protofacist racist nah nah nah nah nah. Grow up and get some original thought will ya.
As my post touches on and Miss C eleborates on, it is the liberal who is the true racist.
interesting, donkeyhue, how when you resort to the cowardly tactic of name calling (or shall i say blustering and bellowing inanities), it's okie dokie. but when others (liberals) do the same, or, to a lesser extent, simply make historical and cultural analogies of the behavior and actions of folks on "your side," you have to cruelly insult them.
what's good for the goose should be good for the gander, or at least that's what i've been told.
Youre kidding right? How long you been coming here?
See thats the problem, that tactic is standard procedure for liberals so you dont see the humor in my using it. If you cant see that I am making a mockery of the lefts propensity for catchphrase politics by now then you are beyond hope.
Your side is a nazi.
.... and once again the liberals have diverted the thread from the topic at hand how liberals love dogs but hate black people.
you're just too mean sometimes, that's all.
anyway, back to the topic at hand, with vick, i can imagine that you might say that black people hate black people. there was a lot of discussion yesterday about how very slow the naacp was in coming to the defense of at least vick's presumed innocense.
also, i think making a comparison between liberal's approach toward terrorism, terrorists and the war and the case of michael vick is TOTALLY ridiculous. TOTALLY. again, the case of moral equivalency comes up. this is partly celebrity "gotcha" journalism ... don't forget that.
I resort to name calling? I've been called a coward, a traitor, a pussy, a moron, and all within the last few weeks. But if I suggest that most so-called "conservatives" are not true conservatives at all I am guilty of labeling people.
And do we liberals supposedly love or hate black people? Make up your minds.
Conservatives, as I understand it, are for small government and liberty, yet the Bush administration is apparently for unlimited Executive power, and a trampling on civil liberties. Real conservatives have criticized these trends. The pseudo-conservatives support the President.
We are on the road to fascism in this country. How far down that road we go depends on all of us, liberal and conservative. You are on the wrong side. You don't have to become one of the hated "liberals". Just become a conservative.
amen, gary.
While it is true that we think you are a coward, a traitor, a pussy, and a moron we also happen to back it up with substance by proving that you are a coward, a traitor, a pussy, and a moron.
You tend to just cry neocon.
"We are on the road to fascism in this country."
You say that likes it a bad thing but let me guess, its Bush's fault.
Dont be ninkumpoop we have long had fascist tendencies going back to the very foundation of this country. Both liberalism and conservatism share traits with it, and some of it is valid, which I dont expect you to fully understand.
The state tells you when you can drive and how fast, tells you when you are allowed to drink or when you can cross the street. The state takes your money and shocker gives it to the state for the benfit of the state.
However your idea of a Mussolino styled Bush dictator is just preposterous and shows your utter lack of understanding how our system of goverment works.
Welcome to America, if you dont want a "fascist" leader.... dont vote for him.
... and liberals hate black people.
... and is it Anita?
Next hippie rally you got to I want you to count how many Free Vick placards there are compared to Free Jose and Close Gitmo posters and tell me how TOTALLY ridiculous it is.
It wasnt so much a comparison as an observation, but nonetheless my point stands!
So fascism is a good thing? Parts of it are valid? Fascinating. Please elaborate. Understanding the allure of fascism is a particular interest of mine.
Im afraid that it would be like explaining car insurance to a caveman as Im not entirely sure you know what it means, in fact Im almost certain of it, not to mention that for Anita's sake I am trying to be nice and wouldnt want to shatter your entire existence by pointing out how exactly it is you who is the greater advocate of fascism than I without even understanding how or why.
everywhere I go theres always something to remind me of another place and time.....
In other words it's just bullshit. And if you possess a superior intelligence you hide it very well.
Exactly I do and thank you.
Understand Im not trying to dismiss you so much as I really just dont think you understand the concept beyond the caricature of Pink Floyd's The Wall.
... but not for nothing if we had that discussion in person, Im almost certain I would make you cry.
Why are we having these philosophical arguments on this post?
Dogfighting? Not my thing but i don't think it's that big a deal. I think it's a cultural thing. I heard an interview with another football player (i think it was clinton portis or johathan vilma) and he said "they're just dogs".
You know in Parts of the world cows are sacred? So people would be starving in the street but wouldn't eat a hamburger. In some countries they allow bullfighting and they kill the bull.
I don't like any of that shit but it's not people, it's just dogs.
Ya like dags?
since we started on the subject by the way, i would think that the
"fairness doctrine" would be a fascist policy. Who's in favor of that one?
So if you're saying we're heading in that direction then i guess you should consider that a big all powerful centralized govt. who forbids its citizens the right to own firearms and wants to dictate what they can and can't listen to on the radio is the first step.
also, as to the fascist/dictatorial tendencies, I would also think that any person in political power who would use instruments of the state to investigate political opponents would be leaning towards fascism
ie. spitzer(state police) Clinton (irs among others) etc.
Just making a point. I don't think we're heading in that direction but if we are it's not because of Bush.
I get it. You are so intelligent that you are beyond reason. Fascism equals freedom. Science is religion and religion is science. It all makes perfect sense now.
No, religion is not science. Religion is faith.
Like for example evolution. You just take it on faith that it's true, therefore it's a religion.
I hope this helps.
Huh where fact is fiction and tv reality what? What are you even talking about. Heres the sad part Im a frickin idiot and still outsmart you with half my brain tied behind my back (c EIB.)
yeah i have to agree with donkey on this one..... he is an idiot! ahahahahahahahaha jackass!
The liberals have been hoping and praying for a fascist takeover. The one constant refrain from liberals is that we are one step away from a fascist police state.
It's because they feel so guilty for having easy lazy cushy little useless lives. So they want to pretend they are oppressed. I see it every day. It makes them feel important to think G.W Bush wants to "eavesdrop" on their pathetic phone conversations with the teachers of their stupid kids in Montessori School.
Massive white guilt=desire to feel at one with the poor and downtrodden. It's like the rich white college kids telling the third world, "I fell your pain, man!" Utter delusional bullshit. In fact the "fascist pigs" are the only thing standing between wimpy White liberals and certain rape, torture and death at the hands of criminals. Liberals are too weak to defend themselves from predators and must rely on those of us with more violent tendancies to protect them.
The so-called fear of government intrusion is all these pampered liberals can complain about as life is just too good for them and they feel soooo guilty about it. Most of them are the educated elite. Instead of realizing how lucky and spoiled they are and being grateful they look on the poor as pure and good.
I have been around the poor my whole life and they are certainly not pure. Many poor people are actually, surprise, suprise, responsible for their own conditions. Shocking, but true.
Miss C if you get to New York Im gonna take you out for the biggest fucking porterhouse in town.
Most poor people were born poor. Most rich people were born rich. What does that do to you analysis?
At least we all agree that Donkey is an idiot.
Rhino: and I suppose you accept creationism on the scientific evidence. I support evolution because of the overwhelming evidence that it is true, and the complete absence of a competing scientific theory.
Miss C: I also would like to feed you some meat.
Gary is starting to use ebonics!
Post a Comment