Linus Liberals

I may not be a kerryish debate club captain but I always at least try to argue the issue at hand. Granted I am a whore with the hyperbole and will throw around slurs like the yellowman makes soup, won-ton-ly that is, but there is usually a method to my madness and if I am taking something to the extreme you can be rest assured that I do so in a mocking manner of what I am arguing against, unfortunately that is usually lost in the keyboard translation.

On that note and allow me to be sidetracked for a moment to thank Jerry Falwell for his enormous contribution to our country, a contribution that is sorely forgotten these days. I am not one for religious demagogy and will make no reference to that obviously significant part of his life here.

What I am talking about is his failed lawsuit against Larry Flynt and Hustler over a satirical cartoon of him. His loss in that case set legal precedent that as a nation we are free to make fun of others and that human emotion can not be legislated. I think with what is going on these days with political correct sensitivity and the vilification and censoring of free speech we would be well served to revisit that case and stop being a bunch of sensitive crybabies.

As I was saying.....

I find the intellectual bankruptcy of the left to be a bore. It is nearly impossible to argue with a liberal, for when they lack the facts to back up their smack, as is oft the case, the left will resort to the age old security blanket from their thumb sucking youth …. name calling.

If I were to argue for a meritocratic system in our schools and workforce I would without a doubt be countered by charges of racism. A call for the protection of our borders would rest assured be met with accusations of xenophobia and a belief in the sanctimony of marriage being between a man and a woman would obviously make me a homophobe.

The issues are never be debated and in turn become nothing more than a glorified schoolyard pissing contest. Yes you are. No Im not. Are to. Are not. Liberalism in itself is a failed argument, that is why they must frame the argument to avoid actual debate, as demonstrated today by Pelosi's move to change House rules for the first time since 1822 to stifle Republican dissent.

I know I sound like a broken record and may myself be going overboard with the generalizations of continually calling the Democrat party and its followers nothing more than Hallmark card ideologues, but sadly it is the truth. Besides Sen. Joeseph Biden there has not been a single democrat that opposes the war that has offered a viable alternative to the current course in Iraq, well besides surrender that is. The single most issue important issue of our day and all the dem leadership has to say is that “war is bad”. Ok we all get that, now what?

Actually hold on a minute I misspoke and was being a self centered American again. I meant Iraq is the second most important issue we face today. The first obviously being the made up man made global warming fraud. We do after all only have five years (according to the Panda not Piper WWF) to solve this crisis or the way of the dinosaur we will go.

Which as always in a round about -- I’l be the round about the words will make you out and out -- kind of way brings me to my point. The main argument from the left besides that the debate is already over is that global warming exists because there is a consensus that says so, those that deny it are skeptics and that ExxonMobil is a big meanie.

Well until the day we once again revert to an Agrarian Luddistic society we are stuck with ExxonMobil, but of more concern to the left since the debate was never about the facts to begin with is what will happen to their argument when the believers become the skeptics and the skeptics become the consensus....When fact is fiction and tv reality?

Wipe your tears away libs.

consensus smensus

EE-Aw!!!