See Id consider myself an environmentalist, a conservationist, an all around outdoorsman if you will. My years living in New York City have diminished my time spent outside, but not my passion for it. I have become the proverbial weekend warrior, but that notwithstanding, the environment remains an issue dear to my heart and I remain active to this day in various organizations that I believe actually make a difference in a small way. As the hippie bumper sticker says, I try to act locally. I'm not trying to save the world, I just build and clean up trails.
I don't let political ideology get in the way, and some groups that I belong to are rife with your typical tree hugging granola munchers, which makes for some great debates. Well, not really as it seems that as soon as they exhaust themselves of their talking points about how man is evil, Exxon is evil, and how George Bush (or fill in the blank GOP) is evil... they don't have all that much too say. I'm used to the rhetoric, and it bores me, but it is more easily dismissed in person than online.
As I mentioned this is something that has been of interest to me since my teens. Like the old saying goes about how if you're not a liberal when you're young.... Well Ive never been a liberal, but like most young idealists, I wanted to save the world too. I just have always taken a more practical common sense approach to it. I walked the walk.
I have seen first hand how man can indeed harm the environment by witnessing Allied Chemical's illegal dumping in the Onondaga Lake or Love Canal (I actually used to throw some mean keggers in the empty houses) as just two examples and will readily admit that mankind needs to be a more responsible steward of our home.
But we are not killing the planet on a global scale, the end is not nigh, and we have not broken the thermostat in less than three hundred years since the Industrial Revolution. Al Gore and his cronies claim that thirteen of the hottest years have occurred in the past twenty years, fer fooks sake the planet is billions of years old, of which man has existed for just a few short ticks of the second hand, and to make that statement is nothing less than scaremongering.
It just doesn't add up, and that is why you only hear one side of the argument about the damage that man is causing and rarely hear from the alarmists about the certain contradictory facts such as the Little Ice Age, The Maunder Minimum, or....
.....Volcanic impact on the atmosphere
Soufriere Hills Volcano, Montserrat photos by donkeyhue
...and the obvious yet ignored impact of Solar Irradiance
Aurora Borealis photo by Senior Airman Joshua StrangThe alarmists do not want scientific debate or they would not be so adamant that the discussion is closed and label all those that disagree as deniers and skeptics. This is not how science works, this is how, yes, junk science works, and in a way religion. If you dont believe in man made global warming then you are going to hell.
They try to discredit those in opposition as monetary pawns of big oil without revealing their own vested financial stakes in the game. Granted, Big Oil has the most to lose, theoretically, but it is also true that the one world alarmists (yeah thats right one world alarmists, Ill get to that in another post) have the most to gain from doing the least.
If a man came knocking on my door telling me there was gold in my backyard, I might believe him, but if he was selling mining equipment as well, then Id slam the door with a quickness. That is in essence what the alarminsts are telling us, and the sheeple are buying it. Time to wake up and shut the door.
EE-Aw!!!


6 comments:
So you made up your mind on global warming 20 years ago and it really doesn't matter how many hundreds of studies are done you will never reconsider your opinion?
You cannot say that the other side has not had a chance to express its opinion. Until a year or two ago just about every news story on global warming featured a skeptic, as if the scientific debate was 50/50 instead of 90/10.
I am not a scientist so if I were a policy maker I would guide myself by the science. Yes, by the consensus, which is real, not by the minority opinion. Particularly since just about every week there is another study published in another prestigious scientific journal supporting the reality of anthropogenic global warming.
The skeptics, on the other hand, rarely publish, if they do research at all. They publish in the popular press instead, where they do not have to face peer review.
Well, back then it was the "holy ozone batman" fraud.
The names and issues du jour change, the tactics stay the same.
Instill fear in the people, so that the greenies can make a money grab, and "scientists" are but willing and well compensated pawns in the game.
I have about zero respect for the majority of lab coats on ALL issues, not just this. You see consensus, I see sheep.
Numbers are a funny thing, they can be skewed in all sorts of ways. Until there is definitive proof I will let common sense dictate my opinion on this subject.
Until then I will ask you directly.
In your opinion, why does the IPCC fail to take into consideration and minimalize the impact of the sun on earth's temperature?
Does that even remotely make sense???
The sun is responsible for virtually all heat on this planet, obviously. The greenhouse gases trap more of that heat in the atmosphere.
The hole in the ozone layer was not a fraud. The hole was observably and measurably there and growing. There was a strong, although not unanimous consensus, much like on global warming today, that CFCs were responsible. CFCs were banned and now, as a result, the hole is measurably shrinking. This is very strong evidence that the scientists were right.
By the way, President Reagan supported taking action on CFCs, and signed the bill into law, to his credit. Would that President Bush had the same sense.
it seems so silly to me to think that anyone believes that Americans are so powerful that we can stop using hairspray and fix the atmosphere.
Silly, and arrogant actually.
Anita, I will admit that I am wrong when I am proven to be wrong.
Until then, just operate under the assumption that I am always right.
Gary, you get bent over him making up his mind 20 years ago but you believe Al Gore knows what's going to happen 40 years from now? That would mean Al Gore made up his mind 40 years before, right? Anyway his lard ass is going to be dead by then. At least I have something to look forward to in my old age. Not having to see or listen to that bloated dullard's thin reedy voice any more.
Post a Comment