I really could care less whether or not Jane Fonda has a motor in the back of her Honda, but if the anti-American anti-"war" leadership wants to put her up as a figurehead and the mainstream media continue to airbrush her sorry pinko ass...then The Aurora will be here to tell the truth.
Jane Fonda NEVER apologized for her treasonous actions in Vietnam. Thats right treasonous. She gave "comfort and aid" to the enemy during a time of war. That my friends is treason. Pretty black and white...uh oh the big bad conservative talked about color -- there I go again with my rampant racism.
Yes its true that three times she has publicly acknowledged according to my recollection and research being photographed (getting caught) on an anti-aircraft gun, and each and every time she did so happened to coincide with a commercial effort that she was involved in being threatened with a public boycott from Veterans Group. Never did she apologize for her actions or words against our troops and the make-outs with the commie cong (no relation to Tommy Chong) at socialism point...only for getting caught on camera.
I dont see the controversy of her appearance at an anti-war rally this past weekend, she fits right in -- she is the face of this movement, why deny it. Oh yeah thats what they do -- deny the truth.
For instance...
Yes I called the anti-war movement anti-American, and the reason I do so is rather simple and not because I am a Bushite (didnt vote for him) Republican (registered Conservative) simpleton (debatable) troglodyte (ok ya got me there) ... its because its the truth.
I really do feel* sorry for those of our liberal readers in Auroraland and abroad that take offense at those remarks -- I really do. I feel even worse that so many, perhaps even good intentioned Americans are being used as pawns in a sophisticated media supported ruse to destroy The United States of America, but that is exactly what they are doing. Just as a practical matter you can not take any group seriously that wants an end to US involvement in Iraq yet demands the US get involved in Darfur because of the civil war or sectarian strife or quagmire, whatever the hippies call it these days.
Its all about Bush and its all about being the contrarian to American interests -- I can assure if the situations were reversed the placards would read "Free Kirkuk" and "Bush Lied Sudan Cried"
Lets take a closer look at some of key players...
Code Pink: Gotta admit sounds good on paper, women in pink, sometimes wearing lingerie --how could I possibly have a problem with that. Well for one theyre not attractive and two they are led by noted socialist anarchist Medea Benjamin and eco-terrorist Jodie Evans. Neither of these women are pacifists as they have both publicy endorsed violence against "symbols of capitalism" as witnessed at numerous WTO protests around the globe.
International Answer: Act now to stop war and end racism. I can get behind that message even as a conservative. Nobody wants war and I wish we did not have to fight them, but in theory the realist knows they are a necessary evil and regarding the current world situation the practical reality is that war was waged on us and it is our duty to defend ourselves and uphold peace treaties (that Saddam had violated) and ceasefires negotiated with hostile nations. When the jihadists throw up the white flag I will be more than willing to accept their terms of surrender. Until then...Kill 'Em All. And it goes without saying as a minority (straight caucasion conservative) I abhor racism and pray for the day of a more tolerant nation where my people will be free from persecution. Did I mention that they are a front group for the World Workers Party and vocal supporters of Kim Jong Il, yet another organization that advocates violence against American interests.
United For Peace and Justice: Co-founded by American Communist Party member Leslie Cagan and acts as an umbrella group for anti-American groups too numerous to mention. She also is no peacenik and openly endorses armed struggle so long as its under the banner of revolucion (see: Che and Fidel).
Youre god damn right Im gonna throw the babies out with the bathwater. Besides the recurring themes of marxism, communism, socialism, anarchy, violence, and horrendous body odor .... they all have one unifying bond that connects them -- They are frauds. They do not care about "Peace" or Iraq or any other nation for that matter (well except the commie ones). Theirs is an ideology of anti-Americanism plain and simple.
Like I said earlier in the post I do not doubt the sincerity of some of the pawns in this game and although I think they are pussies of political convenience -- their heart is probably in the right place but ignorance is not a defense and if you lay down with commies youre going to wake up with fleas (whats that? is that right? they already had headlice -- nevermind)
Let me try another...
You can lead a commie to water but "on no account will a Commie ever drink water, and not without good reason" ...too Strangelovian?
Ok one more...
Stop being such god damn commie bastards ya frickin hippies
EE-Aw
*by feel, what I really meant is that I could give two shits
54 comments:
Wait a minute, did you say treason? You mean partying with the enemy is against the rules? What about going to paris and negotiating a surrender without the approval of your government? is that treason?
Yes
though i wouldn't use the extreme rhetoric that you do, i generally agree with your point that the anti-war movement is led by people who are, essentially, anti-american in the sense that they would like to see an end to our country's days as global hegemon.
but i think they're pretty up front about it once you talk to them.
there are also a lot of level-headed, rational people active in the anti-war movement, however--they're just not in the leadership.
it's sad because extremists are the ones who get all of the air time.
but if you look at the history of leftist political movements in this country, it tends to start with absolute extremists at the vanguard but eventually becomes more mainstream... but still not that mainstream.
hence richard nixon was re-elected in 1972 despite the fact that most people were against the vietnam war (secret plan to end it notwithstanding; our parents weren't that dumb, were they?). the far left alienated the more moderate anti-war crowd preventing a unified political front.
and, if anything, this proves that the supposed "pawns" aren't as stupid as you think. otherwise communism would be a lot more popular, wouldn't it?
and that's good, right? (both the unpopularity of communism and that americans aren't blind sheep.)
look at me, all optimistic.
and do you know the story of the trogdolytes? fascinating stuff.
Donsky, the extreme left didn't become more mainstream, they just got better at disguising their motivation.
Headlice and commie bastards aside I thought I was rather tame (sober) when I wrote this.
As I said I dont doubt the sincerity of some of the anti-war movements followers or that a minutiae are rational thinkers but as I also said its hard to take them seriously when they are carrying placards printed by the World Workers Party.
If anything it proves my point that they actually are that stupid. The leaders are brilliant, they are big tobacco -- selling cancer.
How do you sell an organization whose mission statement is the destruction of the American way of life? Simple. Put a pretty face (celebrity) on a soapbox and you will draw crowds of naive college kids and bored housewives. Its the same reason that all these groups have such cutesy and harmless sounding acronymns for names....appeal to the lowest common jackassinator...and the media is a willing accomplish in this ruse.
Trog story? Well if its fascinating, why dont you share with the class...
Donkey, let me explain it all to you. There is a difference between liberals and radicals. Remember the Vietnam erea protests? Average Americans protested alongside members of the Socialist Workers Party. Lets face it, there are professional protestors and organizers.
This country has a long history of radicalism. Abolitionists, Anarchists, Socialists and Communists. Some played importante early roles in the labor movement, and the civil rights movement, and, yes, the antiwar movement. Some of their ideas have become mainstream. Some of their ideas were just nutty.
I can accept criticism of Fonda or others, but their mistakes or even crimes pale by comparison to those of Johnson, Nixon and Kissinger.
End the war.
"As I said I dont doubt the sincerity of some of the anti-war movements followers or that a minutiae are rational thinkers but as I also said its hard to take them seriously when they are carrying placards printed by the World Workers Party."
Obviously Donkey you DO doubt.
"Them" seriously? Not everyone had those signs. Most did not. The Majority did not.You contradict yourself by pretending to be fair minded in discerning but then you immediately show its bullshit. And..fleeting.
I'm a freedom of speech type so I dont care what signs people hold. Signs dont decide things for me and shouldn't for you.I care what I hold. I love that I have the opportunity to listen to lots of people and not be so insecure about it. And not be shot for it either.
You are an intellectual pussy, Donkey. Get a pair and stop being so fucking infuriated all day.
You cannot differentiate between different people, positions, and I dont think you really understand all of the positions you wrote about here. Why not just write "Dissent sucks, anyone who questions anything is a fuckwitted hippie, shut up while we spread Democracy." Much faster.
I understand that some groups hand out flyers and signs to spread their message at rallies but I also know that they dont necessarily represent all 500,000 people.
Just as I would never suggest you think Parkinson's is a joke just because of Limpballs-as an example. If you do give some people credit for being rational, why do you categorically dismiss everyone who questions and disagrees with you?
When you say Medea Benjamin is an anarchist, I dont honestly think you even know what that means. Or what that has to do with any of this.
I worked for a republican, so does that mean my right to speak is forever revoked?
Grab your own megaphone if you need, but dont begrudge everyone else theirs.
Fact is most Americans disagree with you-and government is not supposed to be run by an arrogant indifferent elite.
"stop being so fucking infuriated all day."
sounds like some pot and kettle action to me......
G,
Thanks for the history lesson.
Thats was my point. The average run of the mill birk wearing liberal are being used by radical extremists and the media are portraying it as mainstream -- its not. Their agenda is radical and has very little to do with "peace" Now before you break out the poll numbers let me explain...
If a pollster asked me Id answer that the war sucks, that I want it to end, that I dont think its being conducted correctly, and the partisan bullshit bureacracy is losing a war we can not be defeated militarily...as you well know I support this war 100%, but my honest answers can be skewed otherwise -- which enables the anti-American groups to hide under the cover of an unpopular war to put forth their agenda. Now I have a history lesson for you...
There has NEVER been a popular war. The Glorious Cause had opposition. The War of Northern Aggression had its detractors. Mexican, WWI, WWII, ...in other words every damn war we've fought.This war is no exception and yet it may very well be the most important to our national security.
Hows Nixon to blame for Vietnam? It wasnt his war, he ended it...sounds like he should be your hero.
Well I forgot Rhino that YOU are the default Aurora psychologist.
Does Donkey know? Word in blogarama is that he's had to go slumming to get his jock rocked AND for some gratuitous psychoanalysis.
Rhino does this mean I should stop sharing my "infuriated with Donkey" rants with you? I thought you liked my hating. You already frikkin polarized St Patrick's Day...
I always think it's funny when libs blame Nixon for Vietnam. They don't even realize that the war began under their favorite Democratic (or is that Democrat as Bush would have said) wet dream, JFK. His idea, his war...Nixon ended it but only because JFK & LBJ (six useless letters when strung together) couldn't manage a war. One couldn't control his pill popping & the other couldn't ever get the water pressure at the White House to his standards, let alone manage a war.
Hey Hey LBJ, how many kids did you kill today? was an unfair slogan because JFK rhymes just as well...and it's probably more appropriate.
jock rocked!
reminds me of the term i use to describe myself FACE JOCK. cause i'm crazy handsome, just ask me.
Is that like Freedom Rock, because if it is......
WELL TURN IT UP MAN!!!
mookie, can you say that just one more time?
oh, and ...
"But there was no fixed beginning for the U.S. war in Vietnam. The United States entered that war incrementally, in a series of steps between 1950 and 1965. In May 1950, President Harry S. Truman authorized a modest program of economic and military aid to the French, who were fighting to retain control of their Indochina colony, including Laos and Cambodia as well as Vietnam. When the Vietnamese Nationalist (and Communist-led) Vietminh army defeated French forces at Dienbienphu in 1954, the French were compelled to accede to the creation of a Communist Vietnam north of the 17th parallel while leaving a non-Communist entity south of that line. The United States refused to accept the arrangement. The administration of President Dwight D. Eisenhower undertook instead to build a nation from the spurious political entity that was South Vietnam by fabricating a government there, taking over control from the French, dispatching military advisers to train a South Vietnamese army, and unleashing the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) to conduct psychological warfare against the North.
President John F. Kennedy rounded another turning point in early 1961, when he secretly sent 400 Special Operations Forces-trained (Green Beret) soldiers to teach the South Vietnamese how to fight what was called counterinsurgency war against Communist guerrillas in South Vietnam. When Kennedy was assassinated in November 1963, there were more than 16,000 U.S. military advisers in South Vietnam, and more than 100 Americans had been killed. Kennedy's successor, Lyndon B. Johnson, committed the United States most fully to the war. In August 1964, he secured from Congress a functional (not actual) declaration of war: the Tonkin Gulf Resolution. Then, in February and March 1965, Johnson authorized the sustained bombing, by U.S. aircraft, of targets north of the 17th parallel, and on 8 March dispatched 3,500 Marines to South Vietnam. Legal declaration or no, the United States was now at war.
The multiple starting dates for the war complicate efforts to describe the causes of U.S. entry."
Rock out with your jock out, I say...
I don't think Rhino was "polarized" or whatever over St.Padraig's day events mentioned in the previous post. Mexicans are generally too busy trying to get in with the Brazillians and their celebration of Carnivalle at that point in the year.
I'd say sorry Rhino...I know you're not Mexican (not that there is anything wrong with that...I think) but what does it really matter? You have no feelings.
BTW - and you know that's for you, you owe me as the whole no feelings thing is totally my bag baby. You can now call me a cripple if it makes you feel better but make sure my two cents are overnighted to me.
PS - What a joke, a Mexican having two cents and the postage to send it to me!
Fly what a nice surprise!
Look who stepped up to the beat box.
Fly, I tried to break into your car and draw Peace symbols. But being a dyslexic hippie, I'm afraid all I left were Mercedes emblems.
And wait- let me get this straight.
You write the poetry,wear man skirts, and have sex to the crooning of Trey Anastasio...but you have no feelings?
Meanwhile Rhino once said maybe victims of domestic vioelence must be doing something wrong or they wouldnt be punched???
Sort out this no feelings crown, guys.
THROWDOWN.
Wow the Fly out of left field with the unsolicited whack...
NICE! You know that hurted!!!
Oh, yeah. That's a walk-off
challenge, my friend. Ten minutes.
Old Members Only warehouse.
ITS A WALKOFF!!!
I'm in, but make sure nobody tells the fly that i can't turn left. shhhh i'm not an ambi-turner.
So fly, when you go out at night do you wear the eye patch and the hook just to... you know... complete the look?
Rhino you never told me if you got to see the Pirate Mythbusters. You're not spending enough time with me.
Can we go fight about it while they play Madden? :)
OK OK seriously I know my attempt to mock the Fly by revisiting the Dyslexic Swastika story was pretty lame, but Rhino dear this is no way to handle a throwdown. Pull your pants up.
You both have to get it out, turn the bitch back to funny level--
Hate mitigation so we can play the Lucky Charms drinking game in harmony.
Yeah, yeah, I'm a one legged pirate. But the one legged pirate is always the captain...and the Mexicans are always the servants.
Swab the deck matey before I give you forty lashes for being a pretty boy...I'd send you off the deck on a plank but you hispanics are good swimmers, somehow you always find dry land in the end.
I guess EB's right...I'll go back to making fun of you for working out at an exclusive private man hole gym. Mexicans don't deserve to be lumped in with metrosexuals. Have fun at Fire Island on St.Paddy's day...I'm sure the ILGO contigent will make you feel welcome!
If Rhino wears a wetsuit...is he still a wetback?
Well at least you admit i'm pretty!
Speaking of which...Youngblood was on last night. Rhino you still have that Rob Lowe poster on your wall.
In the immortal words of Racki....
Wanna go, pretty boy?
No i don't still have that poster! and by the way, it wasn't mine, it was my roommates!
At least i didn't have rick astley like you and the fly had. Didn't you and fly get wasted one night... wait you're irish, don't you and fly get wasted EVERY night and sing that song at the karaoke bar? "never gonna give you up...."
Ok the man gym is better, but I could blow up his shit in my sleep. Come on Fly!
Rhino it looks like we'll have to hit Napper Tandy's out your way. I see no signs of reconciliation.
Unless you have an "in" with those Brazilians?
Well, i have been known to get with some brazilians from time to time. In fact donkey and i used to work a block away from "little brazil". You gotta get there during the world cup! Brazilian chicks get INSANE for the world cup.
good times, good times,
But anyway, i've never been to the napper tandys by me. i've been to the one in smithtown (i don't think its there anymore) but that was a long time ago.
I had to google that dude...
You have issues.
You had to google him? wasn't that the nickname of your original boss in the business?
Weren't you shocked when you finally saw Rick Astley on Mtv? Damn I wasn't expecting that guy.
Rhino I dont know about Smithtown, I lived there once when I worked nearby but all I remember is traffic. And the Smithaven Mall.
EB, if I really wanted to get to No Pecs Whynotmale-tail, I'd just swipe his Clay Aiken CD's and spread a rumor about how Babs is retiring again. You know how those LI girls can be when it comes to Barbara. Speaking of issues, how's that new issue of Details working out for you Rhin-not-atall?
By the by (especially for you Rhino, because it's been a while), I hope everyone knows that I have no real prejudice towards Mexicans. Of course I have no real Mexican friends but I did still eat at Taco Bell during the whole food poisoning scare. Oh Rhino, tell your cousin I said thanks for the extra mild sauce packets.
Actually, i've been in details magazine, and of course glamour (multiple times) and even GQ once. I'm what you might call a model......Sort of. My debut was timeout magazine back in the late 90's. I guess you could say i was a natural. Well I guess it all started the first time I went through the second grade. I caught my reflection in a spoon while I was eating my cereal, and I remember thinking "wow, you're ridiculously good looking, maybe you could do that for a career."
I didnt know that was his nickname, then again I never talked to you homos back then.
Its funny how he went through his roid transformation after I worked with him...Im telling ya -- the fights Id get in cleaning up his mess after hed shoot his mouth off in the wrong bar.
Lily, could you be a sweetheart and grab us some beers?
Alternative lifestyle classifieds don't really count as being "in" a magazine dude...
But okay, I'm willing to give you the benefit of the doubt. You never struck me as particularly attractive...but I guess that's why I'm into chicks and you...well, you know how you are.
Male model huh? Don't worry. You stick to your man gym and maybe you'll be getting work in the Gimbels catalog.
Which reminds me of this famous quote from the Simpsons:
{Scene: Soon enough, the pretzel line becomes the pita line, much to Marge's dismay. She goes to have a talk to her competitors.}
Marge: Excuse me. I had this spot first.
Edna: Sorry dear, just business. Ha!
Marge: Well, I guess Macy's and Gimbels learned to live side by side.
Agnes: Gimbels is gone, Marge, long gone. You're Gimbels.
From Episode "The Twisted World of Marge Simpson"
Just so you know Rhino, you're also Gimbels!
Just a sidenote, but Donkey how can you give two shits. If you shit isn't it just one shit (you did not specify pieces or not). So if you shit once, what do you do? Go back and shit again? And then give it to someone?
I'm sorry but even if someone has annoyed you, it is so not cool to give them one shit and then the shit you had taken previously.
Just looking for some clarification because it is one of those things that is like comparing apples and banannas to me.
what the?..... holy shit that was weird. you're a strange dood.
I honestly dont know how to answer that...so Im just going to punch you in the jowls next time I see you.
"that is like comparing apples and banannas to me"
Are you trying to say that you want to eat my shit for breakfast???
No, in fact I was just trying to say it was a confusing way of stating your point.
However, at least you said "could" instead of "couldn't" like people who say, "I couldn't care less" which would lead me to think that they do in fact care.
Just an example but if you said, "I couldn't give two shits" I'd be even more confused. "What is it about the shits that you cannot part with", I might ponder?
But even still you have revealed more clues to me. It seems that you only eat fruit for breakfast. Perhaps this is why you feel the need to give out more than one stool sample. A healthy one and it's counterpart...scientific method so to speak. Further still it might reveal why you have to take a second shit before the previous one has even reached the sewer.
Sheer profundity if you ask me...
Regardless, like Rhino, you too are Gimbels.
PS - Try to spread out your fruits and veggies...and hold onto your specimen for now.
fly, if someone says they "couldn't care less" that means they don't care at all. If someone says they "could care less" that means they must at least care a little bit because there is something less.
I guess those jesuits didn't teach you any reading comprehension, but at least you can write poetry. cough*homo*cough
You are a total dumb ass Rhino...did you even get a GED?
Two negatives always equal a positive...even with grammar. Bare with me, Zoolander. Go to your calculator and multiply -5 * -5 and what do you get? If you say "not" & "less" you are saying that you do care. Spell it out fruit loop...I could not care less, which means you would not, will not & won't ever not care. You will never care less basically.
The correct English (not Mexican) is pretty easy to work with...reading is fundamental. You are just damn (you don't pronounce the "n" Rhino) mental. I could care less...think about it. I could care less...not 'ta other way around you nimrod.
fly, are you some kind of idiot? You're wrong, that's it. i know you're embarrassed but don't make it worse by just making stuff up. If you didn't care at all, you COULDN'T care less. that's it, it's actually just common sense.
Don't be embarrassed it happens to everyone.....else. not me.
Youre both idjits.
from worldwidewords.com
"In these cases people have tried to apply logic, and it has failed them. Attempts to be logical about I could care less also fail. Taken literally, if one could care less, then one must care at least a little, which is obviously the opposite of what is meant. It is so clearly logical nonsense that to condemn it for being so (as some commentators have done) misses the point. The intent is obviously sarcastic — the speaker is really saying, “As if there was something in the world that I care less about”.
However, this doesn’t explain how it came about in the first place. Something caused the negative to vanish even while the original form of the expression was still very much in vogue and available for comparison. Stephen Pinker, in The Language Instinct, points out that the pattern of intonation in the two versions is very different.
There’s a close link between the stress pattern of I could care less and the kind that appears in certain sarcastic or self-deprecatory phrases that are associated with the Yiddish heritage and (especially) New York Jewish speech. Perhaps the best known is I should be so lucky!, in which the real sense is often “I have no hope of being so lucky”, a closely similar stress pattern with the same sarcastic inversion of meaning. There’s no evidence to suggest that I could care less came directly from Yiddish, but the similarity is suggestive. There are other American expressions that have a similar sarcastic inversion of apparent sense, such as Tell me about it!, which usually means “Don’t tell me about it, because I know all about it already”. These may come from similar sources.
So it’s actually a very interesting linguistic development. But it is still regarded as slangy, and also has some social class stigma attached. And because it is hard to be sarcastic in writing, it loses its force when put on paper and just ends up looking stupid. In such cases, the older form, while still rather colloquial, at least will communicate your meaning — at least to those who really could care less"
Hey donkey, you could have just said Rhino is right and Fly is wrong.
I knew what you meant when you said "i could give two shits" and even though it's pet peeve of mine i didn't say anything about it because i understood the intent. Fly went on a wierd tangent about it and to top it off gave the wrong definition of the saying "couldn't care less".
Then to top it off he used a math example which by the way was also incorrect but i didn't want to beat him up too bad. You see fly, if you were going to apply the double negative it would have to have been "i could not NOT care less" which would obviously mean that you do care.
here endeth the lesson. bitches
I guess "less" and "not" aren't negatives (they are)...but here is the thing. I guess one is meant to be sarcastic but the other is meant to be correct (which it is not exclusively or grammatically). Both imply that you do care to a certain extent though, no? I think both expressions are sarcastic and that is why it is so infuriating. You cannot use two negative identifying factors when without reaching a positive conclusion. So I guess both are sarcastic in that sense.
I'll give it to you because of this fact...it still seems wrong to me...I looked it up and people have been arguing about it since the expression came into being. Apparently, I am supposed to think that people who use the one expression don't care at all. But then why are they commenting in the first place.
For instance, Donkey could give two shits. Apparently he does care a little whether or not he put the "n't" in there or not, right? He made a point to give it a "*" and scroll to the bottom of the page where he could add a footnote.
This is from a world wide words website:
"A bit of history first: the original expression, of course, was I couldn’t care less, meaning “it is impossible for me to have less interest or concern in this matter, since I am already utterly indifferent”. It is originally British {me - blame the Brits for this wordy account, as once again why would you make a point of even commenting if you didn't care at all plus the fact that it pairs two negative words}. The first record of it in print I know of is in 1946, as the title of a book by Anthony Phelps, recording his experiences in Air Transport Auxiliary during World War II. By then it had clearly become sufficiently well known that he could rely on its being recognised. It seems to have reached the US some time in the 1950s and to have become popular in the latter part of that decade. The inverted form I could care less was coined in the US and is found only there. It may have begun to be used in the early 1960s, though it turns up in a written form only in 1966.
Why it lost its negative has been much discussed. It’s clear that the process is different from the shift in meaning that took place with "cheap at half the price". In that case, the inversion was due to a mistaken interpretation of its meaning, as has happened, for example, with beg the question. But the meaning is obviously sarcastic at it's root.
There’s a close link between the stress pattern of I could care less and the kind that appears in certain sarcastic or self-deprecatory phrases that are associated with the Yiddish heritage and (especially) New York Jewish speech. Perhaps the best known is I should be so lucky!, in which the real sense is often “I have no hope of being so lucky”, a closely similar stress pattern with the same sarcastic inversion of meaning. There’s no evidence to suggest that I could care less came directly from Yiddish, but the similarity is suggestive. There are other American expressions that have a similar sarcastic inversion of apparent sense, such as Tell me about it!, which usually means “Don’t tell me about it, because I know all about it already”. These may come from similar sources."
Either way, it still doesn't explain why Donkey wants to give out one or two shits...Are people asking for them or are they just confused by this expression that everyone should avoid using whether it be correct or not!
Alright Rhino, you win this round. It doesn't mean you aren't a nimrod because you are...all it means is that I have to stop getting wrangled in by that lovable Donkey's colloquialisms.
Plus I could have totally bashed you for saying that you are a male model. I just got caught up in poop jokes and ultimately missed the target.
I still got off the best one liner:
Tell your cousin thanks for the extra packets of mild sauce!
I could give two shits if its a pet peeve of yours or if Fly's Jesuit educators were preoccupied parting his hair, and for that matter if the explanation I pasted implied that I was a white trash ignoramus lacking grammatical couth...as long as everyone got the message that hippies are nothing more than commies that lack motivation and leadership skills is all that matters to me.
So sayeth ye olde Donkey
Think about it Fly.
If I gave you one shit, that would probably be a very clear signal of the disdain that I have for you...now if I gave you two shits...well you do the math.
I would rather it be that you could not have given me less shit...because you are so blessed with shit. I only want what's best for you.
And if we want to join the grammar rodeo and start pointing fingers, I'd like to ask one question? Why can't Rhino capitalize? His fingers must be too sore from picking strawberries with his Mexican day laboring friends. I mean it is one thing to have a peeve for an expression that you do not see all that often...but to watch someone day in and day out struggling to use the shift key is another story altogether.
I had no hair in college. Those were the shaven head, dress wearing days. Plus, I made sure to hang out in different bars than the Jesuits. Those guys were some mean ass drunks.
And yes, I think the point was made. We all (except the hippies) think hippies are nothing more than commies that lack motivation and leadership skills. Couldn't you have mentioned something about soap too though? Well, there's always tomorrow!
Or could you have mentioned something about soap too?
Dude this is the most I've blogged in about a year...I'm tired.
Good night Irene...Good night Irene. I'll see you in my dreams.
capital letters and punctuation are OPTIONAL. you can use them or not at your own discretion. i think that was covered in the Aurora rules, and if it wasn't it should have been.
I have concluded that you dont deserve those beers, and that I deserve them myself.
Pay the tab. Donkey.
Tell me Fly didn't start accusing people of being Gimbels...Oh the humanity...
Rhino, can we get back to talking about the hotties on Miami Ink? You need to turn this "two shits" discussion around.
Anita's gonna come punish you all.
Post a Comment