What is it with failed Democratic Presidents and defeated Presidential nominees that makes them need to hold on? Can you ever recall hearing Ford, Bush I, Dole, or Reagan(when still alive..RIP Ronnie) shooting their mouths off all over the world against a sitting President, and siding with everyone but the USA. Now before all you hippies get your tie-dyes in a bunch. I know, we get it, criticizing the administration doesn't make you un-patriotic or un-American (but letting China steal our military secrets does...you hear me Bubba Gore Shrimp Co?)
Says algore now...
"If you have a renegade band of rightwing extremists who get hold of power, the whole thing goes to the right."
BRILLIANT!
So, were back to the vast right wing conspiracy thingamajiggy huh...hmm. Well I'll score that a ZERO for originality, ZERO for intelligent observation (rightwingers moving things right...excellent point jackass), but in all fairness I would give it a 100 for the danceability as the gore's themselves with their Soul Train moves have shown us, if not for tipper's work with the PMRC, which has prevented me from commenting, so I render ZEROS across the board.
What is it with the dems like Carter, Clinton, Gore and Kerry (think about that dream team for a moment), do they have so little faith in themselves and their failed policies that they must constantly seek the spotlight and approval. It shows a lack of class, a lack of character, and a lack of respect for the office they held or attempted to hold. As a group they are, in a word lacking.
I hope algore runs, it will be fun. Fun to see all the hippie pinkos backpedal as fast as bubba pulling his pants down for a chubby intern on their staunch moral stance against the evils of the big corporate GOP money machine, of which algore is now a part of. On a side note, isnt it cute how all these millionaire hippies, such as algore and the Klannedys with their private planes and Escalade cavalades are such defenders of the environment. The only downside is he'll probaly win.
reprint with additional ranting and worse grammar from Jan '06
8 comments:
tough to figure out which one is the worst. I think carter did the most damage, and in such a short amount of time too. Clinton is the rasputin of the crew. I mean the guy was caught up in scandals before he got elected the first time, but still even now he's here making trouble. Kerry and Gore are the sour grapes party. Get over it losers! and shut up! If you can't be part of the solution, don't be part of the problem. I know Kerry has always hated America, but hey at least pretend. And if you can't do that how about just try to show some class.
Gore has become Alan Ginsberg, daddyo...He's cool like dat.
Just to show you his irrelevancy, now he thinks he won the Canadian election too. I mean come on, honestly its Canada..who cares. Well Gore does, perhaps its because he invented hockey.
Well, that may be true but if says that he invented comedy, he best go back and rewind the SNL Greates Hits package because he sure ain't on there.
not entirely sure what your point is here donkeyhuckster.
are you saying that former presidents are to be gagged with regard to expressing their opinions about the current administration? having been in that office for four or more years certainly gives them the right, and i believe, responsibility to speak up and speak out. gentlemanly protocols not withstanding.
"algore" kept his mouth shut for a very long time. and he was criticized for it as being to reticent, TOO respectful of the current administration. plus, he claims now that he will not be running in 2008, but that's yet to be determined.
how do you define a "failed" presidency? i would doubt that many historians would classify the clinton presidency as 'failed.'
and, for whatever you may think of this, john kerry has been working to vindicate his name and reputation in light of the swift boat controversy. perhaps he was taken by surprise (new millenium version of the 'october surprise' perhaps?) by that and did not address it during his campaign, but ultimately it appears that it will be revealed that it was nothing but a nasty and cynical smear campaign designed to draw attention away from his legitimate military record and away from that of the other ass, george 'i joined the reserves went disappeared in a drunken haze for 3 years' bush. versus a man who risked his life and served his country in viet nam.
I'd like to go on record as saying that "stealing military secrets sounds dangerous", and goes against the goal of unifying the world military into one administrative unit. The reason for this: something about getting drafted.
My point? Well, my apologies for not being clearer. They are classless losers, gentlemanly protocols not withstanding of course.
Clinton got lucky. Twice. First that Newt and co's Contract With America got things rolling. Secondly, the internet boom. Everybody was too busy calculating their QCOM and YHOO stock splits to realize or care what a buffoon he was. Historians will remember a blue dress.
I agree with my girl Anita!
Why do you not point out the lack of class of assturds lying about being on boats (when multiple records prove otherwise) simply to lie and attempt to discredit someone's military career?
That doesn't go down in your book as LACKING? To me, that worse than being pussilient or pussilanimous. Its worse than oral from interns. Its worse than building homes for poor people.
You have weird standards for what constitutes "lacking".
maybe its the RIGHT that have the fixation with Clinton, the Kenedys, Gore...get over it.
Post a Comment