Witness the immoral, lying, conniving, two faced, flip-flopping, Lincoln bedroom hotelier, cheating backwoods hilljack. A master politician if there ever was one, and thats not a compliment. Never met a poll he didnt kowtow to, but at least he felt our pain. He should goto bed every night thanking Bill Gates, Jeff Bezos, Steve Jobs et al in Silicon Valley....because everybody in America was too busy counting their internet stock profits and stock splits that noone realized what a scumbag he was.
And now witness the man that would be king if not for running out of his prozac prescription and getting winded after naming only 8 states. Yeeeaaahhhhh!!! This ladies and gentleman is the face of the democratic party, and he hates America. He must, because if this were Vegas, he's betting on the other team. Un-fricking-believable.
Click on the maniac for story
33 comments:
Dean says he's seen this before, during vietnam, and he's right! We won every military engagement then and now, but the same leftover hippie anti american military haters like dean and kerry and clinton are here undrmining the troops, and the war effort! scumbags! why don't they just move to france? i would kick the shit out of howard dean myself if i saw him on the street. fuckin pussy!
My freakin' ears...what's going on with you guys. I know you're mad but I thought we should tone down the expetives? Well. I sure hope Michelle Malkin doesn't happen by on a link back of sorts and see we have potty mouths...she might agree but then assuredly she'll wash out mouths out with soap.
Anyway, Dean is just funny so who cares what he says, not even real Dems care...No one has taken Teddy serious in years (can anyone say, "Man-zier" or "the bro")...but Clinton is the real enemy. He has actually bamboozled a good portion of the country into beleiving he is credible. Do you think Double U would have won if he ran against Clinton? Thankfully there are no third termites so we were spared but if he is not battled he will roll over so it's time to get a plan and attack him with everything we've got..
Dean is right. We will lose this war. But don't worry--when it happens you can blame it on the liberals. And you will.
No good news say Gary Ganews...
We already won the war in Iraq so we can't lose it. It's not like Vietnam in that our objective was to get rid of an individual government that was no good for us or the world which even the Dems beleive to be true. We did that. And now we are doing what only America would do. We are trying to help rebuild a country.
Hey Gary, by the way, how do you feel that a wacky freak from Vermont heads up your party? Are you glad that this is one of the prominent voices of your party. The fact is that I'm pseudo sypathetic to the Dems in that I think it was once a proud party that had ideals one could relate to...but what good does all this bickering do? What is the objective? Did you read the post from yesterday regarding Clinton and the former Yugoslavia? Do you see the similarities? Do you remember it? Bush is your president whether you like it or not? When Clinton was president wouldn't you have said the same thing?
gary, we didn't lose in vietnam, we surrendered. we won't lose in iraq either.
Obviously Dean is insane. How can his entire argument be that we dont belong in the middle east, how we are the cause of the insurgency, and yet then proposes to "redeploy" to Afghanistan, and another "friendy" country to fight Zargawi. Does that make any sense at all?
Thats like saying "We dont belong in Germany" , we are upsetting the Nazis, lets redeploy to Poland to fight Hitler.
I think we sould redeploy in the Carribean...it's friendly and I heard it's nice there this time of year.
i think we should bring our troops home from puerto rico, when are we gonna win that damn war?
Rhinoculous says that we didn't lose in Vietnam, we surrendered. Actually, we just left. In the early years of Vietnam--before most Americans had heard of it--a top North Vietnamese official asked a French journalist his opinion as to how many years of war the Americans wanted--they could have as many as they wanted. (As the French had already discovered.)
Robert McNamara learned the lessons of Vietnam but obviously you guys have not.
Sooner or later we will leave Iraq. Sooner, I would think. The military and the intelligence community have told the Bush administration that there is no military solution. Gadfly says we have already won in Iraq. Great! Let's declare victory and withdraw, as Senator Aiken suggested in the Vietnam era.
I think we will "lose" because we cannot "win." And you will blame the libs for it. I hope I am wrong on both points but this is what I predict will happen. Time will tell.
no, we didn't just leave gary, we surrendered. one of the most embarrasing points in the history of the country. we didn't lose any battles, but john kerry came home after 3 weeks in the jungle and told wild lies about torture and rape, the country turned against the war and the warriors. we sentenced hundreds of thousands of allies to death when we left. disgusting. It was kennedy who got us in, and it was a beaten nixon who got us out. it is a wound that still has not healed to this day. when will the libs learn there lesson? We do not run, we do not quit, we do not appease or surrender. we finish the job, we're Americans. well some of us are anyway.
Ok, rhinoculous --we surrendered, if you insist. Although, as I recall it, Nixon said that the South Vietnamese must fight their own war and we spent years training and equipping their forces--Vietnamization. Now we have Iraqization. How long should we have stayed in Vietnam? The Chinese stayed for a thousand years.
gary it was the chinese and the russians who were giving the vietnamese life! I don't know how long we should have stayed, what is it with you libs and surrender times? how about until we liberated the whole country? or do you think the people wanted to be forced into communism? maybe you think the people wanted to be slaves to thier soviet masters for the next 30 years, i don't think that's the case. how long should we have stayed in europe during ww2? should we have had a timeline? we actually lost some battles there, maybe we should have left sooner.
If you disagree with any right wing antics; does that automatically make you a LIB??
Just curious.
Note: Vietnam was not considered a war-it was a "police action". i wish there was some police action yesterday when some spineless, fag coward hit my aunt's car from behind (while at a light) and ran like the weak pussy that he is.
I'm sorry I just had to get that off my chest
Sorry to hear bro
The North Vietnamese accepted aid from China but did not want Chinese troops. One North Vietnamese official said that the last time China sent troops they stayed for a thousand years. Vietnam was a no-win war. Recall that no amount of training or equipment could motivate the South Vietnames soldiers to fight for their "country." (And, of course, Vietnam was one country before we intervened and it is one country again now.)Our soldiers disparaged the abilities of the South Vietnamese forces and grudgingly praised the North's. The same thing in Iraq today.
But hey, nothing to worry about in Iraq, right? We have already won. The insurgency is in its "last throes." There is a light at the end of the tunnel. And you can blame me and my fellow libs when it all goes to hell.
Try reading a little history.
But did the weak pussy have WMD? Just kidding Gary, that does suck and if people had a conscience they wouldn't do stuff like that...he probably didn't have a license or insurance.
Anyway, notice that I am always careful to refer to "your kind" as Dems...I hate that word "liberal" used in any way...kind of like I hate the word caramel, which some people pronounce Car-mel and others Kara-mel...It gets me upset! Peace in the North East!
Dear Superfly,
thank god we are related. Because if you were a stranger I would seriously put you through the Udai Hussein Soccer Camp.
Thank you for deleting that comment
Sorry to hear that Warlike (not Gary)...
Gary,I was trying to be nice to you. My boy Rhino is wicked smart; he doesn't need a revisionist history lesson from you.
By the way, do you like apples? Oh, you do...
Well, we killed more Vietnamese than they killed of our soldiers...check the history books, that means we won the war.
How do you like them apples!
I didn't realize Warlike, just thought it was a fender bender...I wouldn't play like that...You popped in between Gary & Rhino's cat fight...Anyway, I hope all goes well with your Aunt and they catch the mofo and a little police brutality commences.
Gary, i know my history, our soldiers that were fighting didn't disparage their allies, i mean except for john kerry, but i don't consider him to be a soldier. They did fight for their country, and then we left them to be slaughtered, and they were, by the hundreds of thousands. and contrary to your other false statement, no soldiers are praising the enemy in iraq. do you just make stuff up as you go along?
Shouldn't they be half empty glasses?...sorry but half full is optimistic. Only no news is good Ganews.
Honest answer Gary.
Will you feel vindicated if we do in fact "lose" the war in Iraq? Will it make you happy to score political points? Will it make you happy that Bush was wrong and you were right?
Wouldnt you rather be "wrong" and support our troops and root for victory? to root for America?
Just asking
You must be very thirsty living your life drinking from glasses that are half empty
corrected. bad mine is. always the optimist am i
So Rhino you are telling me that John kerry is a liar. And stuff like the "My Lai Massacre"(no pun intended) never happened?
Standard lib dem diversionary tactic. Comparing the two is futile, apple and oranges, but it gives dems an opportunity to pontificate on their greatest military victory, Vietnam...
Start a war, going gets rough, abandon the troops, blame it on the Republicans, then say "i told you so" and claim moral high ground and victory. Sickenening!
warlike, first of all i'm sorry about your aunt. if there's anything i can do, obviously let me know. secondly, the mai lai incident happened, but in war things happen. it was an isolated incident, it was not business as usual. And i might point out that it was an American soldier who stopped it, and reported it. the offending parties were prosecuted and punished for their crimes. john kerry was not there, he did not witness anything, but he testified at the winter soldier hearings among other places about atrocities that he claimed at the time were true. comparing our soldiers to genghis kahn etc.
Dont you mean Jenga Khan? Like the parlor game.
Do you think if the French Fries were in Iraq, that they would make their soldiers give back found booty like the millions floating around Iraq? And then prosecute them for crimes. No other country protects a land they conquered like we do...To the victor goes the spoils unless you are American...then you have to cowtow to the conquered, let them shoot at you, spit in your face, etc. No other country's soldiers live up to the codes of conduct that we do...that's why it's sickening and disturbing that Dems want to beleive our soldiers are thieves and rapists. Why are you so eager to hate our military? I have no doubt that you love this country but where does the cynic in you come from...France? Seriously, the kid in me loves the frosted good natured taste I get from victory and the grown up in me understands the need for patience and loyalty with the frustrating grainy flavor of loss. What cereal are you eating?
Gadfly, so we won in Vietnam because we killed more of them? Ho Chi Minh had this to say: "You can kill ten of my men for every one I kill of yours. But even at those odds, you will lose and I will win."
Well, if Ho Chi Minh said it then it must be true...Do you wish he was your president? Because if you do then you probably took a wrong turn at Albuquerque. South East Asia's that-ah way! But seriously, what would you think if one of our leaders said that ten of our soldiers lives was worth one of the enemies. You'd say he was crazy, uncaring and last but not least...evil. The fact is during the Tet offensive which is lauded as such a brilliant strategic move (by the way we used the same tactic on the Brits during the revolution except it really worked because we killed more Brits and lost less Americans) by the commies very own General Giap and his cohorts. But how can you win when the lives lost is larger on your side. No real military person could ever say that is a win so how can you. I know what you are saying but by anyone with a conscience's standard, it is sick to think that one life is worth more than another. Marines know who won the war. So go in to your local VFW and tell one of them that we lost. You'll get a real rise out of them...
No, I do not wish Ho Chi Minh was my President. But he said that we could out-kill his side, which we did, and then in the end we would leave, which we did, and then he would win, which he did.
But then you have the liberals to blame there too. Personally, I would blame the architects of the flawed policies.
Damn here you guys are talking about the horors of war and you have Ted on your blog without a shirt, for a sec i thought he was a new M.O.T.W., you know there was alot of tit showing.
anyway gary remember it was the Dems that got us so involved in vietnam, but facts, what are they to a lib?
Post a Comment