Bad Job NY Post

Why was there ZERO coverage in my local paper of the 64th anniversary of the attack on Pearl Harbor? Perhaps the number 64 isn't as appealing as other more sexy newsworthy numbers, such as 100th, 75th, 50th, or say 25th. As in the 25th anniversary of the shooting of John Lennon featured on today's cover of the NY Post. I'm not saying that Lennon wasn't a culturally influential figure, but whatever happened to "a date which will live in infamy". Big fricking whoop the hippie writes a few decent songs and he gets the cover yet Pearl Harbor is not only deemed unworthy of a cover story, but is deemed unworthy of ANY coverage in yesterdays NY Post. Shame on you!!!