I'm so angry

This is the kind of thing that we see in the main stream media every day, and it almost never gets exposed. I'm sure we all saw the "new study" on fetuses not feeling pain until the last tri-mester of pregnancy. It was reported very prominently on World News Tonight, and on every other network news show. It was in every major newpaper including the NY Times, LA Times, Washington Post, etc. The story in the Chicago Tribune is typical of the way the story is reported. First of all, the "study" came about because of a new initiative to inform women who want to have late term abortions about fetal pain. The "doctors" who did the study didn't actually do any lab work, they just did a "study" on other work that's already out there. In other words, if 5 out of 10 doctors agree with you, use those 5, and forget the others. Another little trick of the media that we don't normally pick up on is the identity game. In this aricle they tell you that Douglas Johnson is legislative director for the National Right to Life Committee, and say he "attacks" the study. They mention DR. Eleanor Drey as one of the authors of the study, but don't mention that she runs an abortion clinic in San Francisco that does over 600 late term abortions every year! They also fail to mention that the main author of the study is a student and former employee of NARAL! They also mention " several doctors agree" but don't name these doctors. These people have an agenda. No matter where you fall on the abortion issue, this kind of "reporting" should make you angry. More importantly, if a child is born premature, and needs some kind of surgery they use anaesthesia!!! Why do they do that??? What is the difference?? I'll answer that for you, there is no difference. These people have an abortion agenda, it's big $, and the media is a willing partner.