"Frank Lombard is an associate director at Duke University's Global Health Institute and a homosexual who was charged last week with the molestation of his adopted 5-year-old black son and actively trying to sell him for sex on the internet.
The 40 words above are 40 more than the Main Stream Media has said on this horrible story. "
link
28 comments:
This is so disgusting i can hardly believe it.
.
Gee, i wonder why the boyscouts don't want gay scout masters? Could it be because NAMBLA is a gay organization?
You know what would have gotten this story on the front pages?
If this guy was a preist instead of a teacher
This story must have received some coverage because I saw it. I know Huffington Post carried it. A google news search for the suspect's name gives 647 hits.
If this guy is guilty, he should never see the light of day.
As always you miss the point Gary. Ok its on a few websites. Every major media outlet had reporters camped at Duke for months during the Lacrosse Fraud. Rich white straight guys are easy targets for the liberal media, case in point Sanford getting more press than a fucking fag perv molesting and selling his adopted black kid for sex not getting any mainstream coverage.... wouldnt want to offend the lib constituency. Its not news because it doesnt promote the lib agenda. The perv in question is the face of liberal anything goes ideology.
We can overcome Obama, a militant media should give cause to all Americans.
I agree that the Lacrosse thing got way too much play because they were white. So did the Nancy Holloway thing.
A general web search for 'Frank Lombard arrested' gives over one million hits (more than a few) including ABC and all the major media.
But I'm sure you will go ahead trying to politicize this case.
And by the way only bigots use the word "fag" unless they're English and referring to cigarettes.
Oh Im sorry did I offend the Homosexual-American that rapes children by calling him a "fag". It seems fitting, but thank you for proving my point that liberals defend child molesters. My guess is he will get a lighter sentence than Madoff.
Oh forget it. I am not defending a child molester. No one is defendig him, except maybe his lawyer. If he's convicted I hope they throw away the key. This is not a liberal/conservative issue.
Sadly it is.
Justice Ginsburg would defend him.
Scalia would not.
You do the math.
Its why none of the networks or major papers have coveraged this story in depth.
... and for the record you did defend him too, I called him a name you thought was un-pc and like a fag in shining armor you came to his defense.
OK, look I would also object if you called OJ Simpson a "nigger" even though I think he's a murderous bastard. But the word is offensive to all black people. I hope this clears it up for you.
I'm not sure why you think Justice Ginsburg would defend a child molester. Liberals are against molesting children. Really.
Maybe Im crazy, but I find murder and rape more offensivee. You my friend is what they call in the animal kingdom a hypocrite. You throw around terms like nazi and fascist like they are candy at a Duke Administration NAMBLA Social but nigger and fag are out of bounds? To me personally and once again call me crazy but the enslavement of blacks by liberal indoctrination and failed racist policies of telling them they arent good enough to fend for themselves is so much worse than a word that will be tossed around more casually tonight at the BET Awards than a black child at a Duke Adminsitration Mixed Social. You sicken me. Your hypocriscy sickens me. Your lack of original thought sickens me.
The reason I think Ginsburg would defend child molesters is because she has, some would even go so far to say she made her career defending child molesters. Someone that follows politics would know that, a search engine troll would not. That you know so little about our Supreme Court proves to me your general ignorance on all things political and that your ideology is based on sheepish blind devotion and google.
OK, there's really no doubt: you are crazy. That last comment pretty much proves it. I've never called you a nazi or a fascist. Or Bush or even Cheney. Or anyone that I recall, unless it was an actual nazi.
You're right about one thing though. I don't have a clue what you're talking about regarding Justice Ginsburg. Did she defend a child molester as a lawyer? Or overturn a child molester's conviction?
child abuse is an entirely and grossly under-reported issue. period. the only stories that make it out into the open, widely, are the ones that are particularly digusting and repellent, as is this one.
neither the mainstream media nor the alternative media pay much attention to this issue at all.
and as gary said, this issue cannot be categorized as either conservative or liberal, gay or straight, rich or poor, scalia or ginsberg or whatever.
and, very sadly, it is a terrible thing that happens every day and media outlets pick it up only when it is forced down their throats.
once again you guys are grasping at straws to make a point. i suggest that you perhaps spend some time volunteering in a battered womans shelter, or becoming a "big brother" to some under privileged child, or get a job as a volunteer at a public school, or become a foster parent to an abandoned child, or search the local papers far and wide for these stories and try to find some a way in which YOU can help ... they are all over the place.
stop complaining and do something. oh, sorry. never mind. that's what' acorn is trying to accomplish. and you hate them, too.
http://abcnews.go.com/News/story?id=7942546&page=1
oh, and ABC News is not the MSM?
You sure done did show me, why golly gee willickers I guess ABC is the msm. You like Gary are an idiot and miss the point. You link one story from ABC and think thats proper coverage? They use the word allegedly more times in that one story than the entire coverage of the Lax Fraud. Now I'm sure you like most average Americans are sickened by this story, but the fact is that this perv is the face of modern liberalism. Its why a Ginsburg would defend NAMBLA, why liberal judges continually give light to no jail time to child rapists and murderers, why the lib media refuse to cover stories like this because they know it sheds a negative light on liberalism. Same reason they rarely refer to dems in scandals as democrats. If it was priest or a Republican you'd never hear the end of it, but a gay lib not so much. Maybe you're the one that should be doing something, and cleaning the pervs out of your party would be a pretty good fucking start
"alleged" is always by reporters and others. innocent until proven guilty. whether you like it or not, that's how we do it here in america. if you don't like that you should move afghanistan or some other non-democratic state.
it's hilarious how you put all the "pervs" in the liberal category, given the recent penchant by republicans for "perversity" in the way they define it.
in fact, i am contributing my time to a cause a believe it. i tutor adults in english as a second language. i am also pursuing a master's in teaching english as a second language (or rather TESOL, teacher of english to speakers of other languages). i believe non-english speakers are the most vulnerable of our population, particularly women, who cannot reach out for help when they need it, cannot communicate when they are being absused, andm most importantly, they cannot rise above poverty. the young men and women i tutor are dying to learn english, are dying to be "americans" to be respected to live the american dream.
what are you doing donkeyhue and rhino, other bragging about YOUR having achieved the american dream (while wishing to deny it to others) and other than complaining about having to pay taxes.
I swear to fucking god you guys are retarded. Its like arguing with children. Alleged is not "always" used by reporters. Wasn't used for the Duke Lacrosse players. Its used as a political tool by the militant wing of the liberal media. John Edwards love child is a non story, Sanford is on every channel.
I'm not saying all perks are libs, just saying that only neo-liberalism endorse it.
it may not "always" be used by reporters, but it "supposed" to be used by reporters.
that's all i was saying.
sanford is on every channel because what he says about himself reveals him to be a major, major hypocrite. larry craig was on every channel because he was allegedly a seriously hypocrite, as well.
what's good for the goose, is good for the gander.
why do you say we wish to deny the American dream to others? Because we don't believe that illegal aliens who are here in violation of the laws of our country and who are a drain on every aspect of our society should be sent home or incarcerated?
What is the American dream to you? I would think that part of that would be to live here lawfully and to assimilate, not to march on los angeles like petulant little babies making demands. Or maybe you also think the American dream involves gang membership? supporting organizations that believe the entire southwestern U.S. is rightfully owned by mexico? smuggling drugs and weapons across our borders? Tresspassing on the property of actual U.S. citizens and then suing them for making you get off of said property? Are these the people whose American dream i'm denying?
The Mexican government exports the dregs of their country to us like castro did with his boat lift and you want to teach them english so they can figure out how to collect welfare easier.
I'm glad you feel good about yourself. I think you're a fool.
if you want to stereotype every mexican or other immigrant as a "drain" on our society, that's your call. and, in fact, i do agree that there are many who are using our system illegally. however, there are far more than you will acknowledge who are working toward assimilating and who are, in fact, working to learn english, obtain legal jobs, raise their children to be upright, contributing citizens and so on.
i don't deny the nefarious goings on. i just can't abide by stereotyping.
oh, and i'm glad i feel good about myself, too. i'm sorry that you feel so awful and full of anger and hatred.
so i don't abide by people who break our laws to come here and then steal from me and every other citizen and then march in the streets to protest how bad they have it here and that means i'm full of hatred and anger.
I don't hate these people. I'm not even mad at them. I do however believe that they should be sent back to their country of origin and not be allowed to return.
You don't deny the nefarious goings on but you don't want the laws enforced?
Maybe you would feel differently if you realized how much the presence of these people actually hurts you. You don't because the media doesn't tell the story and you don't want to do your homework. maybe that's the next post.
Moochass Grassy ass.
when was the last time a mexican stole a job from you or the donkey?
They stole my Big Wheel when I was 4 yrs old living in the barrio of LA, and by barrio I mean Burbank.
... and btw Rhino is Mexican, just the legal kind.
I'm not sure when any mexican or any other illegal may have stolen a job from me. I don't know of any time offhand, but just so that you know some of the jobs i've held where i worked side by side with a few, i was a dishwasher at the Trolley Barn restaurant in Speonk NY.(terrible job)I was in landscaping for 2 summers and for about 3 years i worked construction. Cement to be exact.
Anyway, the truth of the costs is much more than just stealing jobs.
yes, i know that rhino is mexican of the legal kind. but i bet he sends money home to his abuelita.
Btw Anita, what are you doing Friday? Im having a barbeque at Rhino's house. Email me for address, too late to send out an invite. (just be hush about it, he doesnt know yet)
Three things.
1. I'm not mexican
2. Anita is welcome at my home any time.
3. No peeing in the pool
When Im a bigshot with a pool Im going to have a sign that reads...
"Welcome to our L. Notice theres no Poo in it, Keep it that Way"
Post a Comment