Ok the Souter thing...
Seems everyone on the left is in agreement that Obama should put a woman on the bench. I thought the politically correct thing was to replace that which retired. So my questions is... are the dems calling Souter a chick? In other words, a fag.
I mean I know he's never been married and eats yogurt for lunch but to call him a light loafered nancy seems a bit harsh after all he's done for liberals.
And if youre going to call him a mo, then why not step up to the plate and name a full fledged flamer to replace him on the Supreme Court? Im talking Justice Rip Taylor with confetti type mo.
Man up Obama and put your cards on the table for all to see, unless of course you dont want to reveal that your position on the gays is pretty much the exact same as the Republicans.
6 comments:
I saw little dick durbin on Fox this morning trying to defend Obama's comments that he wants someone who will have sympathy for the poor or whatever the hell he said. I have to say that guy is almost as dumb as joe biden.
He's so stupid he basically admitted that he wants a judge who will legislate from the bench. I mean i know that's what the libs want but at least they should be smart enough to lie about it on the most watched cable news network in history! In his defense though i'm not sure he actually knows what the courts role is supposed to be. Moron.
by the way donk, you know it's not a big deal if the guys a homo unless he's a republican. Same thing if he's a racist(kennedy) or an adulterer(kennedy) or a murderer (kennedy)
Kennedy's a murderer? You mean he drove off that bridge on purpose? Nor do I think he's a racist. I'll have to give you adulterer, although in his defense he's a Kennedy.
Personally I don't care if the new justice is a man or woman, or gay or straight. So long as he/she's a liberal. But I think we can count on that. As for legislating from the bench, need I remind you of Bush v Gore?
I've noticed the new pattern at The Aurora. Ignore my point, ignore the facts, get in one last insult, and then close the thread. As for the hypocrisy charge, that would apply to you not me. I'm against outing any undercover CIA agent by anyone. You're not.
MY new pattern is to address you only once unless i'm bored. So here it is. I don't ignore your points, you have yet to make any. we don't ignore facts.I close the comments on some of my posts AFTER you've had plenty of comments and chances to make your point, not before.
Yes we will get a liberal for the court. Bush V Gore was not legislating from the bench. Thank you for proving your stupidity once again. It's not necessary but i always appreciate the laugh.
finally, you don't seem to be upset about these guys being outed but you had a hissy fit about plame. Personally i think the husband is a complete and utter scumbag, and she's an opportunist but as i said before there was no crime. Therefore the rest of it was a political witch hunt. So there may be no crime this time either, i'm no lawyer so who knows but the yours and the rest of your ilks hypocrisy knows absolutely no bounds.
You may comment further if you like but i'm done with you on this post.
I will share your outrage in the unlikely event that these guys turn out to be undercover CIA operatives. As William F. Buckley said, "the sacredness of the law against betraying a clandestine soldier of the republic cannot be slighted." He knew that Plame was a CIA official operating under nonofficial cover, at least during the period covered by the statute. The Special Prosecutor, the Judge, and the CIA knew it too. That's why the CIA referred the case to the DOJ. But, I know, rightwing talk radio and Fox News said otherwise. The same people who would have cried treason if it had happened during the Clinton administration. So who is the hypocrite?
The two psychologists seem to be ex-military people, former SERE instructors, who opened a pivate company, with 150 employees. If that company should turn out to be a CIA front, I will be with you. Athough you must admit they were "outed" at least two years ago, and the CIA did not refer a case to DOJ.
Plame served her country honorably in the CIA, no doubt at personal risk, and Wilson likewise as an Ambassador, who stood up to Saddam Hussein and was praised by George H.W. Bush. But he dared to criticize the Bush administration and the rightwing attacked. That's what they do. God I miss honest and intelligent conservatives like William Buckley. I used to watch Firing Line all the time.
Post a Comment