Come Out And Play Ay

As Cyrus once said.... "Can you count suckas? I say, the future is ours.... If you can count."

It is still early in the Presidential race, and although the liberal media is already crowning its darlings Rudy and Hillary as the inevitable victors history has shown us otherwise and that the front runner rarely wins the dem nod and that conservative Republicans will throw party loyalty aside to vote their conscience and express their dissatisfaction by voting for third party candidates like Buchanan or Perot.

Which brings me to my third favorite Bond villain and the likely recipient of my electoral largess, Congressman Ron Paul. Although I am not quite ready to rescind my Official Auroran endorsement of Rep. Duncan Hunter (actually maybe I am) there is no better candidate that matches my own personal politics than Paul with one exception, and its biggie.... the Iraq War.

Although both our reasoning for opposing the war in the first place was identical , that sometimes, as cold as it seems, that its better to have one big bully intimidating the other bullies while picking on a few kids than to have a whole playground of bullies beating up all of the kids, but my opposition ceased when Saddam forced our hand and we put boots in the sand.

That being said I have never bought into the democratization of Iraq and that alongside the blitzkrieg on Baghdad has proven to be the two biggest strategical errors made to date. However, despite the poo-pooing of the dumb dumbs on the left... The mission WAS accomplished, so post GWB 2008 with the White House left in capable conservative hands willing to remain vigilant in our defense against terrorism I'd have zero problems with exiting Iraq.

Which brings me back to my original question to the pollsters and the pundits.

Can you count SUCKAS????

Rep Ron Paul has had strong to very strong straw poll showings, has won damn near every debate, and is raising as much if not more donor donuts than the top tier candidates and yet to date has been largely ignored by the media.

Which leads me to two conclusions.

The first of which is a scientifically proven fact of which I garnered a peer reviewed pub consensus last night at Wifey McBeateys....

The media is a bunch of brand name starfucking celebutards that despite being liberal and progressive fear change and who are too incompetent to cover anything besides one named amoeba-like unicellular organisms like omigod Britney and Hillary and Rudy such as you know.

The second being that for all the criticism of this war and nansy-pansy contrarianism the left is not an antiwar party but rather as has been said here ad nauseum an anti-President George W Bush bunch of pusillanimous America haters. Don't believe me? Well look no further than the fact that every major dem candidate either voted for the war or have declared that they will keep troops in Iraq, and in Clinton and Edwards case... both. How does that make you feel libs?

So... They are against the war before they will be for it???

Huh.

Okay okay three conclusions....

I can understand why Kucinich is being ignored as he's much too short to be noticed and the fact that hes certifiably insane (which might be his only good quality) but besides Kucinich the only real anti-war candidate is Rep. Ron Paul who in my opinion is hammerishly 2 legit 2 quit, 2 legit, 2 legit 2 quit. The guy's got a 100% approval rating from The Constitution Party, so hes got that going for him as well.

So here's the deal I will make with you hippies. We all unite and elect Rep. Ron Paul President and I will trade you the Iraq War for the Secure Fence Act, the elimination of the IRS, the Dept of Education and our withdrawal from NAFTA and the WTO.

Okay? Savvy!

"We've got the Moon Runners, right by the Van Courtland Rangers. Nobody is wasting nobody. That...is a miracle. And miracles is the way things ought to be...."

Can you dig it...